THE LINE · WEEK REPLAY

2025, week 8.Assessed before it was played.

We rebuilt the model from weeks 1–7 only — 108 completed games, nothing after — wrote down what it had to say about each week-8 matchup, and then opened the week to see whether those statements survived. Every scoreable week of 2025 is here; pick one from the chart below.

Week 8 games

108

Games the model saw

Statements checked

54.6%

Held, full season

Read this before the results

No prices are involved. Our line archive is append-only and begins on 29 July 2026, so there are no archived 2025 closes — and inventing them from another source would be exactly the fabricated data this product exists to refuse. Nothing here says whether a bet would have won.

This is not a third backtest. Two pre-registered attempts to beat NFL game markets both found no edge. That budget is only spent by comparing a forecast to a price, and this replay never sees one.

What it does measure: whether a statement like “this defense has allowed the 2nd-most receiving yards to receivers” was still true the following week — the defense staying on the same side of the league median.

Did the descriptions hold?

Week 8 alone

60%

24 of 40 statements

A single week is a few dozen statements — far too few to separate a real effect from one good or bad Sunday. It is shown beside the season figure, never instead of it.

All 14 weeks, 2025

54.6%

341 of 624 statements · 95% CI 50.7–58.5%

The interval clears 50, so the descriptions do carry week to week — but only just. A matchup note is a real tilt, not a reason to be confident.

How often each kind of statement holds

Every confidence percentage on THE LINE links here. It is not a win probability and not a projection — it is how often a statement of that exact class was still true the week after we made it, measured across all 624 scoreable statements of the 2025 season.

By claim

What a chip on a row is actually quoting. The classes are not equal, and until now the site showed one average for all of them.

“generous to WRs”

63/105 held · 95% CI 50.4–68.9

60%

“stingy against WRs”

57/107 held · 95% CI 43.9–62.4includes 50 — no measured edge

53.3%

“generous to TEs”

57/102 held · 95% CI 46.2–65.1includes 50 — no measured edge

55.9%

“stingy against TEs”

62/106 held · 95% CI 49–67.4includes 50 — no measured edge

58.5%

“generous to RBs”

48/100 held · 95% CI 38.5–57.7includes 50 — no measured edge

48%

“stingy against RBs”

54/104 held · 95% CI 42.4–61.3includes 50 — no measured edge

51.9%

By how strong the claim was

The calibration question: does a statement about the most extreme defense in the league hold up better than one about the eighth? Directionally yes — but read the intervals before believing it.

Top 3 in the league

135/234 held · 95% CI 51.3–63.8

57.7%

Ranked 4th–8th

206/390 held · 95% CI 47.9–57.7includes 50 — no measured edge

52.8%

The spread between our best and worst class is real: “generous to WRs” at 60% against “generous to RBs” at 48%. If you only trust one kind of matchup note here, trust the first.

Sharper claims did hold more often — 57.7% against 52.8% — but the two intervals overlap heavily, so we cannot claim that gap is real. It is reported because it is what we measured, not because it flatters the model.

A class whose 95% interval includes 50 is marked in amber and is not distinguishable from a coin flip. We leave those on the site, labelled, rather than quietly dropping the boards that produce them — a reliability table that only ever confirms the product is marketing.

Week by week — tap one to open it

Bars measured from 50%. Week 8 is open below — tap any bar to read that week in full. The default is week 6, one of the worst of the season, on purpose.

Every week-8 game

Each note is what the model would have said going in, with the sample size it rested on. the description still held that week · it did not · not scoreable (bye or no qualifying plays).

BUF40@

CAR9

Final

BUF · 52% pass · 0.145 EPA/play

55% pass · -0.007 EPA/play · CAR

BUF had allowed the 3rd-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for CAR.
through week 7 · 6 games · 116 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 104 allowed · league median 105
CAR had allowed the 5th-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for BUF.
through week 7 · 7 games · 67.9 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 53 allowed · league median 47.5
CAR had allowed the 8th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for BUF.
through week 7 · 7 games · 75.9 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 238 allowed · league median 105
BUF had allowed the 8th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for CAR.
through week 7 · 6 games · 134.3 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 152 allowed · league median 145.5
CAR had allowed the 3rd-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for BUF.
through week 7 · 7 games · 116.7 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 132 allowed · league median 145.5
BUF had allowed the 2nd-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for CAR.
through week 7 · 6 games · 21.8 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 23 allowed · league median 47.5

CHI16@

BAL30

Final

CHI · 54% pass · 0.026 EPA/play

57% pass · -0.037 EPA/play · BAL

CHI had allowed the 5th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for BAL.
through week 7 · 6 games · 110.8 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 116 allowed · league median 105
BAL had allowed the 6th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for CHI.
through week 7 · 6 games · 109.7 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 69 allowed · league median 105
BAL had allowed the 7th-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for CHI.
through week 7 · 6 games · 67 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 38 allowed · league median 47.5

CLE13@

NE32

Final

CLE · 62% pass · -0.160 EPA/play

55% pass · 0.119 EPA/play · NE

NE had allowed the 2nd-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for CLE.
through week 7 · 6 games · 72.5 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 99 allowed · league median 47.5
CLE had allowed the 6th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for NE.
through week 7 · 7 games · 127 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 222 allowed · league median 145.5
CLE had allowed the 6th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for NE.
through week 7 · 7 games · 70.6 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 124 allowed · league median 105
NE had allowed the 2nd-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for CLE.
through week 7 · 7 games · 59 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 19 allowed · league median 105

DAL24@

DEN44

Final

DAL · 62% pass · 0.158 EPA/play

59% pass · 0.049 EPA/play · DEN

DAL had allowed the 4th-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for DEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 168.9 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 196 allowed · league median 145.5
DAL had allowed the 8th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for DEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 103.4 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 163 allowed · league median 105
DEN had allowed the 4th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for DAL.
through week 7 · 7 games · 117.4 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 204 allowed · league median 145.5

GB35@

PIT25

Final

GB · 52% pass · 0.167 EPA/play

58% pass · 0.099 EPA/play · PIT

PIT had allowed the 1st-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for GB.
through week 7 · 6 games · 184.7 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 170 allowed · league median 145.5
PIT had allowed the 6th-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for GB.
through week 7 · 6 games · 67.2 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 152 allowed · league median 47.5
GB had allowed the 4th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for PIT.
through week 7 · 6 games · 66.5 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 93 allowed · league median 105

MIA34@

ATL10

Final

MIA · 63% pass · -0.038 EPA/play

55% pass · -0.017 EPA/play · ATL

MIA had allowed the 1st-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for ATL.
through week 7 · 7 games · 128.6 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 43 allowed · league median 105
ATL had allowed the 2nd-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for MIA.
through week 7 · 6 games · 116 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 155 allowed · league median 145.5
ATL had allowed the 1st-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for MIA.
through week 7 · 6 games · 16.5 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 6 allowed · league median 47.5
MIA had allowed the 1st-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for ATL.
through week 7 · 7 games · 110.6 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 81 allowed · league median 145.5

MIN10@

LAC37

Final

MIN · 60% pass · -0.066 EPA/play

66% pass · 0.021 EPA/play · LAC

MIN had allowed the 7th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for LAC.
through week 7 · 6 games · 131.2 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 140 allowed · league median 145.5
LAC had allowed the 6th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for MIN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 38.7 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 31 allowed · league median 47.5

NYG20@

PHI38

Final

NYG · 54% pass · -0.046 EPA/play

55% pass · 0.036 EPA/play · PHI

NYG had allowed the 2nd-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for PHI.
through week 7 · 7 games · 181 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 127 allowed · league median 145.5
PHI had allowed the 5th-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for NYG.
through week 7 · 7 games · 166.6 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 92 allowed · league median 145.5
PHI had allowed the 3rd-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for NYG.
through week 7 · 7 games · 31.4 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 41 allowed · league median 47.5

NYJ39@

CIN38

Final

NYJ · 56% pass · -0.097 EPA/play

68% pass · -0.091 EPA/play · CIN

CIN had allowed the 1st-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for NYJ.
through week 7 · 7 games · 76.6 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 58 allowed · league median 47.5
CIN had allowed the 2nd-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for NYJ.
through week 7 · 7 games · 122.7 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 198 allowed · league median 105

SF15@

HOU26

Final

SF · 59% pass · 0.021 EPA/play

59% pass · -0.025 EPA/play · HOU

HOU had allowed the 5th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for SF.
through week 7 · 6 games · 37.3 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 45 allowed · league median 47.5

TB23@

NO3

Final

TB · 60% pass · 0.040 EPA/play

58% pass · -0.086 EPA/play · NO

NO had allowed the 7th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for TB.
through week 7 · 7 games · 104 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 88 allowed · league median 105

TEN14@

IND38

Final

TEN · 66% pass · -0.230 EPA/play

55% pass · 0.223 EPA/play · IND

IND had allowed the 3rd-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for TEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 173.1 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 151 allowed · league median 145.5
IND had allowed the 3rd-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for TEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 71.9 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 76 allowed · league median 47.5
TEN had allowed the 4th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for IND.
through week 7 · 7 games · 113.6 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 160 allowed · league median 105
IND had allowed the 7th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for TEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 70.9 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 108 allowed · league median 105
TEN had allowed the 7th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for IND.
through week 7 · 7 games · 42 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 53 allowed · league median 47.5

WAS7@

KC28

Final

WAS · 54% pass · 0.043 EPA/play

59% pass · 0.168 EPA/play · KC

WAS had allowed the 7th-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for KC.
through week 7 · 7 games · 161.4 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 175 allowed · league median 145.5
KC had allowed the 5th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for WAS.
through week 7 · 7 games · 118.9 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 89 allowed · league median 145.5
KC had allowed the 4th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for WAS.
through week 7 · 7 games · 33.1 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 60 allowed · league median 47.5

This is the whole product, on real football: context you can check, with its sample size attached, and no claim we haven’t measured. When the 2026 season starts, the same notes appear on the matchup pages — beside a line archive that records what the price did.

See this season’s matchups

Read this before the results

This is not a third backtest. Two pre-registered attempts to beat NFL game markets both found no edge. That budget is only spent by comparing a forecast to a price, and this replay never sees one.

Did the descriptions hold?

Week 8 alone

60%

24 of 40 statements

A single week is a few dozen statements — far too few to separate a real effect from one good or bad Sunday. It is shown beside the season figure, never instead of it.

All 14 weeks, 2025

54.6%

341 of 624 statements · 95% CI 50.7–58.5%

The interval clears 50, so the descriptions do carry week to week — but only just. A matchup note is a real tilt, not a reason to be confident.

How often each kind of statement holds

By claim

What a chip on a row is actually quoting. The classes are not equal, and until now the site showed one average for all of them.

“generous to WRs”

63/105 held · 95% CI 50.4–68.9

60%

“stingy against WRs”

57/107 held · 95% CI 43.9–62.4includes 50 — no measured edge

53.3%

“generous to TEs”

57/102 held · 95% CI 46.2–65.1includes 50 — no measured edge

55.9%

“stingy against TEs”

62/106 held · 95% CI 49–67.4includes 50 — no measured edge

58.5%

“generous to RBs”

48/100 held · 95% CI 38.5–57.7includes 50 — no measured edge

48%

“stingy against RBs”

54/104 held · 95% CI 42.4–61.3includes 50 — no measured edge

51.9%

By how strong the claim was

The calibration question: does a statement about the most extreme defense in the league hold up better than one about the eighth? Directionally yes — but read the intervals before believing it.

Top 3 in the league

135/234 held · 95% CI 51.3–63.8

57.7%

Ranked 4th–8th

206/390 held · 95% CI 47.9–57.7includes 50 — no measured edge

52.8%

The spread between our best and worst class is real: “generous to WRs” at 60% against “generous to RBs” at 48%. If you only trust one kind of matchup note here, trust the first.

Week by week — tap one to open it

Bars measured from 50%. Week 8 is open below — tap any bar to read that week in full. The default is week 6, one of the worst of the season, on purpose.

Every week-8 game

Each note is what the model would have said going in, with the sample size it rested on. the description still held that week · it did not · not scoreable (bye or no qualifying plays).

BUF40@

CAR9

Final

BUF · 52% pass · 0.145 EPA/play

55% pass · -0.007 EPA/play · CAR

BUF had allowed the 3rd-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for CAR.
through week 7 · 6 games · 116 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 104 allowed · league median 105
CAR had allowed the 5th-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for BUF.
through week 7 · 7 games · 67.9 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 53 allowed · league median 47.5
CAR had allowed the 8th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for BUF.
through week 7 · 7 games · 75.9 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 238 allowed · league median 105
BUF had allowed the 8th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for CAR.
through week 7 · 6 games · 134.3 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 152 allowed · league median 145.5
CAR had allowed the 3rd-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for BUF.
through week 7 · 7 games · 116.7 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 132 allowed · league median 145.5
BUF had allowed the 2nd-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for CAR.
through week 7 · 6 games · 21.8 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 23 allowed · league median 47.5

CHI16@

BAL30

Final

CHI · 54% pass · 0.026 EPA/play

57% pass · -0.037 EPA/play · BAL

CHI had allowed the 5th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for BAL.
through week 7 · 6 games · 110.8 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 116 allowed · league median 105
BAL had allowed the 6th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for CHI.
through week 7 · 6 games · 109.7 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 69 allowed · league median 105
BAL had allowed the 7th-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for CHI.
through week 7 · 6 games · 67 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 38 allowed · league median 47.5

CLE13@

NE32

Final

CLE · 62% pass · -0.160 EPA/play

55% pass · 0.119 EPA/play · NE

NE had allowed the 2nd-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for CLE.
through week 7 · 6 games · 72.5 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 99 allowed · league median 47.5
CLE had allowed the 6th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for NE.
through week 7 · 7 games · 127 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 222 allowed · league median 145.5
CLE had allowed the 6th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for NE.
through week 7 · 7 games · 70.6 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 124 allowed · league median 105
NE had allowed the 2nd-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for CLE.
through week 7 · 7 games · 59 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 19 allowed · league median 105

DAL24@

DEN44

Final

DAL · 62% pass · 0.158 EPA/play

59% pass · 0.049 EPA/play · DEN

DAL had allowed the 4th-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for DEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 168.9 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 196 allowed · league median 145.5
DAL had allowed the 8th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for DEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 103.4 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 163 allowed · league median 105
DEN had allowed the 4th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for DAL.
through week 7 · 7 games · 117.4 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 204 allowed · league median 145.5

GB35@

PIT25

Final

GB · 52% pass · 0.167 EPA/play

58% pass · 0.099 EPA/play · PIT

PIT had allowed the 1st-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for GB.
through week 7 · 6 games · 184.7 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 170 allowed · league median 145.5
PIT had allowed the 6th-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for GB.
through week 7 · 6 games · 67.2 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 152 allowed · league median 47.5
GB had allowed the 4th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for PIT.
through week 7 · 6 games · 66.5 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 93 allowed · league median 105

MIA34@

ATL10

Final

MIA · 63% pass · -0.038 EPA/play

55% pass · -0.017 EPA/play · ATL

MIA had allowed the 1st-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for ATL.
through week 7 · 7 games · 128.6 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 43 allowed · league median 105
ATL had allowed the 2nd-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for MIA.
through week 7 · 6 games · 116 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 155 allowed · league median 145.5
ATL had allowed the 1st-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for MIA.
through week 7 · 6 games · 16.5 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 6 allowed · league median 47.5
MIA had allowed the 1st-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for ATL.
through week 7 · 7 games · 110.6 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 81 allowed · league median 145.5

MIN10@

LAC37

Final

MIN · 60% pass · -0.066 EPA/play

66% pass · 0.021 EPA/play · LAC

MIN had allowed the 7th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for LAC.
through week 7 · 6 games · 131.2 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 140 allowed · league median 145.5
LAC had allowed the 6th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for MIN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 38.7 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 31 allowed · league median 47.5

NYG20@

PHI38

Final

NYG · 54% pass · -0.046 EPA/play

55% pass · 0.036 EPA/play · PHI

NYG had allowed the 2nd-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for PHI.
through week 7 · 7 games · 181 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 127 allowed · league median 145.5
PHI had allowed the 5th-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for NYG.
through week 7 · 7 games · 166.6 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 92 allowed · league median 145.5
PHI had allowed the 3rd-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for NYG.
through week 7 · 7 games · 31.4 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 41 allowed · league median 47.5

NYJ39@

CIN38

Final

NYJ · 56% pass · -0.097 EPA/play

68% pass · -0.091 EPA/play · CIN

CIN had allowed the 1st-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for NYJ.
through week 7 · 7 games · 76.6 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 58 allowed · league median 47.5
CIN had allowed the 2nd-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for NYJ.
through week 7 · 7 games · 122.7 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 198 allowed · league median 105

SF15@

HOU26

Final

SF · 59% pass · 0.021 EPA/play

59% pass · -0.025 EPA/play · HOU

HOU had allowed the 5th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for SF.
through week 7 · 6 games · 37.3 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 45 allowed · league median 47.5

TB23@

NO3

Final

TB · 60% pass · 0.040 EPA/play

58% pass · -0.086 EPA/play · NO

NO had allowed the 7th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for TB.
through week 7 · 7 games · 104 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 88 allowed · league median 105

TEN14@

IND38

Final

TEN · 66% pass · -0.230 EPA/play

55% pass · 0.223 EPA/play · IND

IND had allowed the 3rd-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for TEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 173.1 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 151 allowed · league median 145.5
IND had allowed the 3rd-most receiving yards to TEs — good news for TEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 71.9 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 76 allowed · league median 47.5
TEN had allowed the 4th-most rushing yards to RBs — good news for IND.
through week 7 · 7 games · 113.6 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 160 allowed · league median 105
IND had allowed the 7th-fewest rushing yards to RBs — good news for TEN.
through week 7 · 7 games · 70.9 rush yds/gm (league median 89.3)
Week 8: 108 allowed · league median 105
TEN had allowed the 7th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for IND.
through week 7 · 7 games · 42 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 53 allowed · league median 47.5

WAS7@

KC28

Final

WAS · 54% pass · 0.043 EPA/play

59% pass · 0.168 EPA/play · KC

WAS had allowed the 7th-most receiving yards to WRs — good news for KC.
through week 7 · 7 games · 161.4 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 175 allowed · league median 145.5
KC had allowed the 5th-fewest receiving yards to WRs — good news for WAS.
through week 7 · 7 games · 118.9 rec yds/gm (league median 144.6)
Week 8: 89 allowed · league median 145.5
KC had allowed the 4th-fewest receiving yards to TEs — good news for WAS.
through week 7 · 7 games · 33.1 rec yds/gm (league median 51.8)
Week 8: 60 allowed · league median 47.5