
B — top 40% of 65 qualifying RB
Where he stands across games already played, weighted by what persists. The whole board.
Share of his own offense — the part of production that carries to next week.
Who arrived and who left MIA since 2026, and what each of them commanded of their own offencethat year. Observed shares — nobody's projection. The totals are share points brought in from elsewhere, not a percentage of MIA's targets.
Nobody with meaningful prior usage.
Across 1,570 incumbent receiver seasons since 1999, an arrival this size cost the incumbent about 0.2 points of target share — against a year-to-year swing of ±4.6. Real, and far smaller than the noise it sits in.
The other half of the intuition — that a defence can no longer double him — was tested on the same seasons and did not appear: the effect on yards per target was -0.003 to 0.006, an interval straddling zero.
What actually moves a target share year to year is reversion: shares are pulled toward 19.1%, and that term is several times larger than anything the roster did. How we measured it
His own rushing yards game log, counted against three round numbers either side of his median. No model and no projection — these are games he has already played. We show it because a player’s own history is the thing our receptions model failed to beat. The receipts.