Final · Las Vegas Raiders 26, Los Angeles Chargers 14
Both prices with the bookmaker's margin removed. This is the market's number, not ours — we don't forecast NFL games, and we publish why.
Teams the market priced at 80–85% won 267 of 324 games since 1999.That is almost exactly what the price claimed — this market prices accurately.
The two prices add up to 103.9%. Everything over 100% is the book's edge, taken whichever side you pick.
LV · 5 games, 172 attempts
34.4 attempts per game · team runs 63 plays at 57% pass · sacked on 4.4% of dropbacks
7.4 yards per attempt · 65.1% completions · 0.191 EPA per dropback
LAC has allowed 7.3 yards per attempt across 5 games
Following the DraftKings spread · one of 2 books archived · 2 prices on record
Opened -8.5 on Wed, Jul 29, 53 days before kickoff.
One reprice since, 1 point of movement in all. It closed -9.5 — the favourite is 1 point bigger than at the open.
Half of the movement was over by Wed, Sep 9, 8 PM ET.
1 point at once — -8.5 to -9.5 on Wed, Sep 9, 8 PM ET.
Every sentence above is arithmetic on prices we recorded and the times we recorded them. Nothing here says where this number goes next.
Counts from 6,967 regular-season games since 1999. No model, no forecast — this is the history of the number itself, not a claim about this game.
Favourites of 9.5 covered 75 of 154 games.
The range covers a coin flip.
They won outright in 124 of 154.
Totals of 42.5 went over 116 of 221 times.
The range covers a coin flip.
Home handicap. Dashed rules are the key numbers.
Over line.
The books haven't posted player props for this game yet — normal this far out. The archive is already watching for them: the moment a price appears it is captured, kept forever, and becomes loggable here.
When they land you'll get the same book you get on the game lines — closing-line value, a letter grade and a good-bet verdict on every prop you log. No projections: our prop model failed its own pre-registered calibration gate, and we don't ship numbers that failed.
Every point above is a price we observed and stored, with the time we saw it. Nothing on this page is a prediction, a rating, or a recommended bet.
Every row is a rate measured over games already played, never a probability — the same components behind each quarterback's Index below. Our passing model failed its calibration test; we publish that on the accuracy page.
Expected volume from the inputs above. Unvalidated — it is arithmetic on what has already happened, not a forecast that has been scored against outcomes.
The market has his team at 16.5 points implied.
The index ranks this quarterback and this matchup against every qualifying passer, over games already played. It is not a probability and not a bet — our passing-yards model failed its calibration test, and we publish that on the accuracy page.
LAC · 5 games, 143 attempts
28.6 attempts per game · team runs 58 plays at 49% pass · sacked on 10.6% of dropbacks
6.6 yards per attempt · 59.4% completions · -0.193 EPA per dropback
LV has allowed 7.9 yards per attempt across 5 games
Expected volume from the inputs above. Unvalidated — it is arithmetic on what has already happened, not a forecast that has been scored against outcomes.
The market has his team at 26.0 points implied.
The index ranks this quarterback and this matchup against every qualifying passer, over games already played. It is not a probability and not a bet — our passing-yards model failed its calibration test, and we publish that on the accuracy page.
Across 6,967 regular-season games since 1999, 24 of 28 spread rungs with a usable sample had a 95% interval containing 50%. In other words the number itself has never been an edge, at any rung, in twenty-seven seasons. What it is good for is knowing which numbers are expensive to cross — and a rung holding fewer than 30 games is shown greyed rather than dropped.